Scientists receive 12.6 million dollar grant to format references correctly

Untitled presentation (2)A team of scientists has received a 12.6 million dollar grant to format their references correctly. PI Thomas Banders is ‘very excited’ about the news: ‘In this time of budget cuts, this grant really is a fantastic opportunity. It allows us to spend most of our time on what is every scientists’ true passion: abiding by arbitrary formatting restrictions and figure formatting guidelines that mostly made sense when the printing press had just been invented.’

Banders’ team made a breakthrough in 2008 when they were the first team to publish a paper where more time had been spent on formatting the references than on writing the paper. “When we broke that barrier, after four resubmissions to different journals with completely different formatting guidelines, we realized we were onto something big. With this grant we can explore what happens when we collaborate using incompatible versions of Endnote, use a group-wide customized bibtex file on a fragile server, study the relative merits of square versus curly braces, examine the importance of mentioning issue numbers and explore how to best shorten journal titles so as to be both unrecognizable and unintelligible.’

Banders says they will not limit themselves to existing formatting guidelines. “We believe that we can really push the boundaries of reference formatting, and are working on a whole new set of guidelines. We want people to use alternating italic and boldface for odd and even references, cite all methods papers in helvetica neue bold, every prime letter should be highlighted in beige and underline and the reference list should be alphabetized by the fourth letter of the surname of the senior author. Also, the reference list should be submitted separately as a WordPerfect document. We’re convinced this new system will improve the content of the papers tremendously.’

Researchers around the world are happy about the renewed interest in reference formatting. ‘Science history is written around hero figures like Newton, Curie and Einstein, but we shouldn’t forget who they depended on: A large supporting team of scientists who spent 40% of their time formatting their papers according to arbitrary guidelines’.



  1. Cath

    Not only do you have to spend inordinate amounts of time formatting and reformatting the references, but I have recently found out that the EndNote Styles are not necessarily the same as style required for the journal and that Springer, particularly, are masters at introducing lots of errors into your nicely formatted references that you had recently spent inordinate amounts of time on getting correct, such that you have to have a second set of proofs to check that they have corrected the errors they introduced! It really is about time that reference styles were standardised. I don’t see why any publisher should need to have more than a choice of 4 styles.
    Oh, and congratulations on the grant!

  2. Heidy

    Reblogged this on Sexy Geeky Life and commented:
    I thought this was a painting at first but I was wrong and I am happy about that. This just makes me want to run out to the local farms help with the March planing.

  3. Stephen Richard

    This project makes great sense in light of last month’s article that ‘no further research is necessary’. Scientists can spend all their time formatting references!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s